![tenfourfox no encryption overlap tenfourfox no encryption overlap](https://cdn.extendoffice.com/images/stories/doc-excel/no-overlap-bubble/doc-no-overlap-bubble-11.png)
TenFourFox for Mac OS X - Download Notice. PowerPC forever! Our SF repo is only for hosting our current and future downloads at this time (thanks, SourceForge!). TenFourFox is not an official Mozilla product and is not a Mozilla-maintained build of Firefox. This is the download repository for TenFourFox, the Firefox port for Power Macintosh computers running 10.4 and 10.5. Although the Downloader uses current encryption methods to download the browser, the Downloader itself is accessed over unencrypted HTTP. The Downloader will not operate on an Intel Mac. The TenFourFox Downloader requires a Power Mac running 10.4 or 10.5. As a rule, the browser acknowledges whatever it recognizes and ignores the rest, so there's certainly no harm in trying.Ĭase in point, while still bearing nowhere near the same improvement as in TenFourFox (with itself bearing nowhere near the same improvement as in Firefox Quantum, keep in mind), I have tried pairing past iterations of foxPEP with Camino and have still seen positive results, so there is at least that. That said, you can still try slotting foxPEP into Classilla manually and see what happens. Therefore, a hypothetical 'ClassillaPEP' would be, to a certain extent, an effective waste of time. Largely, I found that as there is typically less code, features, and technologies baked into these older versions, there is equally less potential room for expansion, thus decreasing your return on investment. The capabilities to locally handle Web 3.0 just aren't there.įurther expanding on this, I have experimented with older Mozilla codebases in the past. Kaiser releasing a standards update, the most you can realistically do is to just use a proxy service like and call it a day. I suspect the 'diminishing returns' wouldn't justify the time cost, compared to other things that could be done for Gryphon makes good points. Otherwise, though - someone who has a clue absolutely please correct me if I'm wrong, but my current understanding is that Classilla's problems are more about what it doesn't have than what it has and doesn't need, and it's not clear to me how much gain you could get from about:config tweaks. It's possible there are other caching or network changes that could be made too, a field that I know I know nothing about. I think foxPEP does overlap with some of those goals (for instance, I know it has a list of bloatware domains that it blocks), so there are some things that Classilla could incorporate. A package of local JS libraries, to avoid having to load them from remote sources - or possibly 'JS equivalency' library, to translate flashier features into something Classilla can handle.Other smart 'bloat removal'/filtering features, as seen in foxPEP or favorite TFF extensions.Improved CSS engine, with more ways to 'gracefully' strip, re-render or ignore things that are too heavy.Modern security protocols - essential for actually using websites.If I had to make a grocery list of key improvements to help modernize Classilla, it'd probably like something like this: You could reasonably run OS 9 off of a flash drive at USB 1.1 speeds, something Apple considered to be such a bad idea for OS X that they wouldn't even let you try it.) (It's easy for us to forget about this nowadays, but X and its 'stuff' use dramatically more space, memory, and CPU than 9. Finally, you have a little less of a load to begin with just by virtue of it being made for 9. Also, a lot of the time, the libraries or extensions that would be required to make the high-end high-cost features in TenFourFox work don't exist for Classilla and/or OS 9 in the first place. Given that the fastest computer that can natively boot OS 9 is a G4, and it's expected to also support the G3 and pre-G3 crowd, the design goal, rather than striving for modern-browser-equivalency, is already to make something that can run with less resources. "foxPEP".Ĭlassilla is different, more like a coast-hugging 'Monitor'. Most people don't have those engines, or like their ship to be a bit faster so that it can keep up with the rest of the fleet, so they start taking things off that they don't need to reduce the weight and increase the speed, e.g. When you have a powerful enough engine to bear the weight (like a maxed-out G5 tower), it can move along smoothly enough to serve as a relatively modern warship. To draw up a naval analogy, TenFourFox strikes me as sort of a lumbering battleship, everything covered with inches of armor or equipment to protect against and cover any possible contingency. I'm not an expert, but I do have an interest in retro browser talk, so I thought I'd offer my thoughts here to maybe help stir things up.